Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d668c1bb78f42c39ea85ac7c779d5ba@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 01:30:40 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation

On 2012-06-17 01:28, magnum wrote:
> On 2012-06-17 01:25, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
>> Regarding switching memrchr to strrchr, I dont think this is correct,
>> they are strings on input, but I store them in a format that can be
>> converted to SHA-1 input very quickly and there is no guarantee there
>> is a nul byte at the end.
>
> Yes but we search for 0x80 and this *will* be present. I see no problem,
> and it works just fine.

Oh, I see what you mean now. You are probably right we should change this.

magnum


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.