|
Message-ID: <e3040a60c12762751e5aa8706c2b0f2f@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:38:41 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: notes on sharding the incremental search space On 2012-06-14 16:32, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/14/2012 04:25 PM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Tavis Ormandy<taviso@...xchg8b.com> wrote: >>> p.s. I also have a sha-1 implementation that's a little faster than the >>> jumbo version, would this be the right list to send that to? Is there a >>> jumbo cvs repo I can checkout to patch against? >> >> Jumbo code is developed on github. Check >> https://github.com/magnumripper/magnum-jumbo. You can clone, modify >> sources and then send a pull request to magnum. >> > > Probably the latest git version is considerably faster than the last > jumbo version. I was going to say "not much" but I just checked raw-sha1 and apparently it's 33% faster. I'm not sure how that happened, from memory the code changes only boosted it by like 10-12% (and this CPU does not support XOP or other stuff that Solar added optimisations for). $ ./john-jumbo5 -t -form=raw-sha1 -conf=legacy.conf Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [SSE2i 8x]... DONE Raw: 8416K c/s real, 8416K c/s virtual $ ./john-magnum -t -form=raw-sha1 Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [SSE2i 8x]... DONE Raw: 11110K c/s real, 11184K c/s virtual magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.