[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2aa20ad3140bf2dffcf5f672a0e11ca@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:35:25 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Patch: allow --markov=SECTION in addition to --markov[=[MIN_LEVEL-]LEVEL[:START[:END[:[MIN_LENGHT-]LENGTH]]]]
On 06/10/2012 11:18 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 11:11 AM, magnum wrote:
>> $ ../run/john --stdout --markov=markov
>> Statsfile not defined for Markov mode markov
>>
>> $ ../run/john --stdout --markov=markov2
>> Statsfile not defined for Markov mode markov2
>
> I thought about adding a more appropriate error message in this case.
> But then I tested
>
> $ ./john --incremental=doesnt_exist --stdout
> No charset defined for mode: doesnt_exist
>
> And then I thought, the first iteration doesn't need to be better than
> the official john ;)
But the first case, --markov=markov should use the existing section
[Options:Markov] so it should be the same as just saying --markov with
no parameters. And it does have a statfile defined.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
