|
Message-ID: <4FD06789.3050904@linuxasylum.net> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:34:17 +0200 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@...uxasylum.net> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: john.conf options subsections On 06/07/2012 02:33 AM, magnum wrote: > On 06/06/2012 10:31 PM, magnum wrote: >> On 06/06/2012 10:26 PM, Claudio André wrote: >>> Em 05-06-2012 02:23, magnum escreveu: >>>> On 06/05/2012 12:48 AM, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >>>>> 2012/6/4 magnum<john.magnum@...hmail.com>: >>>>>> On 06/02/2012 12:25 AM, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >>>>>>> We should get rid of KPC :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean in favor of GWS? >>>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> I had that thought too. How about we change all OpenCL *_KPC entries >>>> in john.conf to *_GWS, and use the environment variable GWS instead of >>>> KPC? If we want to change this, now is the time. Anyone disagree? >>>> >>>> magnum >>> >>> Decided? Should i submit my patch? >> >> Please do. No-one objected to it. > > Samuele, In order to not make a diverged mess out of the git trees I did > the above to all of your formats as well, after fixing RAR and applying > Claudio's patch. From now on the environment variables are LWS and GWS, > and the john.conf sections are named similarly. yup thanks a lot, by the way i missed all the discussion about gws (i suspect it is global work size) instead of KPC could you point me to where it all started ? Cheers Samuele
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.