[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP3459537C09FECEA0D10C001FD0E0@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:02:15 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New version of john.bash_completion
On 06/02/2012 04:05 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 01:42 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> Thanks, committed now. For some reason your patch did not apply so I
> used the complete file from john-users.
The file from john-users is fine.
Here is the next diff. Hopefully this time I did it right.
It contains some minor bug fixes and enhancements.
Please let me know if you wish more detailed information.
Hopefully there are no more changes required before the next jumbo
release, but feel free to suggest changes.
I also prepared a doc/README.bash-completion.
May be a little less detail would have been sufficient.
(The readme file is almost the same size as the bash completion scipt.)
Please have a look at my README file, and suggest or apply changes as
you see fit.
BTW:
Should the names of the doc/README files be unified?
We have README.something as well as README-SOMETHING.
Frank
View attachment "john.bash_completion.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (6077 bytes)
View attachment "README.bash-completion" of type "text/plain" (19384 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
