[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e021bea113a1289a00444e1e9fa8a04@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:49:16 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Fork/node options (was: Re: [john-contest] how to load md5(phpbb)
and md5(wordpress)?)
On 06/01/2012 02:05 PM, Rich Rumble wrote:
> I want fork, as if you didn't know :)
I want it too. For a multicore single host, --fork is more convenient
than MPI. There are two things left to fix I know of:
1. The original problem that you can't resume a forked session.
2. Ideally, the rec files from a forked or an MPI session should be
compatible, so you can start with MPI and resume with fork, or the other
way round.
This is not really hard, just tricky. I have started trying to fix this
a couple of times, but so far I have given up. Maybe someone else could
give it a try? Now at least my unified fork/node/MPI tree is brought up
to par with bleeding-jumbo again, that's a good start.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
