Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP141A9958D4795FB103FCFA2FD070@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 10:15:43 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SHARCS 2012 paper

On 05/27/2012 05:01 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:32:06PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> Here's a paper of SHARCS 2010 (Special-purpose Hardware for Attacking
>> Cryptographic Systems).
>>
>> http://2012.sharcs.org/record.pdf
>>
>> Among other presentations, starting at page 35, you'll find
>> Sprengers, Batina: Speeding up GPU-based password cracking
> 
> I commented on this one here:
> 
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2012/04/01/13

I wasn't sure whether it was mentioned on john-dev, and tried to search
old mails, but I missed that.
Now I even found the exact same link mentioned by Rich in march, but
referring to the assembly language for GPUs article:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2012/03/28/10

> BTW, I just found that the author had inquired on a related topic on
> john-users in 2011:
> 
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2011/01/31/1

So, in the replies it was pointed out that there are faster
implementations, and where to find the patches. But in his publication
he still used a non-optimal build and older code?

Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.