|
Message-ID: <9a0f0d9aa5bd48ec2c4546dde313785d@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 20:42:34 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SHA-512 OpenCL On 04/18/2012 04:45 PM, Claudio André wrote: > Hi, i can't reproduce here the errors Solar is getting. > > Someone (i see Solar message) has hardware and time to help? We will > make some tests in order to find out what is wrong in these boards. > > Thanks. > > > 1. i played a lot with the source code here. I agree it is slow, but it > works on CPU and GPU, on self-tests and real cracking. > 2. attached a new patch (it includes the new method of getWorkGroupSize > information) as discussed in the list. > 3. i'm more interested in new 7xxx AMD boards and Nvidia ones. Seems to > be the best place to look for errors. > > PS: magnum, do you have NVIDIA, right? Does it work in your hardware? I now tried your format on an AMD Loveland (E2 mobile) and it segfaults just the same way as with nvidia. I just got a vague idea: Are you developing on 32-bit? Has anyone ran this format successfully on 64-bit? magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.