[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09870e3071d1edb0c22c6dadb118707f@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:05:00 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: WPA-PSK format
On 04/14/2012 12:45 AM, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> 2012/4/14 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>:
>> Until then, just a brief notice (here) about what to put in the input
>> file would do just fine. Is it part of one particular packet? If so,
>> what? A valid association? A beacon?
>
> It seems that patch in the current form is not very usable.
> I used this site: http://jorisvr.nl/wpapsk.html
> to see how keys are generated, but in real use we do not know this key.
>
> Further work is needed then, and this might be good staring point:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGFjEGyjUcU
That was discouraging but it might not be as bad as it seems - I *think*
you did the right GPU things regardless. We just need some more glue and
hopefully this will be CPU code anyway.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
