[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANJ2NMMyA6nh6MMfB5C0o0Jdcyfp7cZOMVFmA+P+fxk3Q23zRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:48:26 +0800
From: myrice <qqlddg@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Hello, interested on slow hash and fast hash on GPU
Hi, Solar,
Thank you for your answer. What I was done last week is :
1) I read papers you recently posted. And I emailed author of qhasm-cudasm
for requesting the tool.
2) The bitslice implementations of SHA-256 or SHA-512 on GPUs are worth
discussing. I read your bitslice implementation of MD5. It takes advantages
of sse2 to compute MD5 hashes at one time. Now raw-sha256-cuda
implementation already use SIMD and/or bitslice. I tried use more
threads(than now just 1) to compute one hash. However, the data dependence
make it hard to implement. I am looking forward ideas of optimization.
3) As you suggested, I am starting write DES format on cuda. I will make
another post to track my progress and clarify questions on it.
Thanks!
Dongdong Li
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
