[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc67187add0321edfad28c48ece21a6e@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:41:33 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Sorted format list
On 02/21/2012 11:36 AM, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> 2012/2/21 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>:
>
>> Also, I'd really like the CUDA formats renamed to eg.
>> cryptmd5-cuda so they end up in the "right" place in this list.
>> This would make it easier to notice that a certain format has
>> alternatives.
>>
>> Even after that, we have inconsistencies like sha-crypt-256 vs.
>> cryptsha256-cuda. I'm willing to rename sha-crypt-256 to just
>> cryptsha256 (it's shorter!). There are other cases, like
>> salted-sha1
>>
> Sorting is ok. I'll remove cuda prefixes today. What with raw
> formats like: cuda-rawsha256 raw-sha256
>
> Should they have "raw-" prefix or just "raw" like you proposed for
> crypt?
I think we should keep the raw- prefix as it's established already for
sha1 and md5.
On 02/21/2012 11:40 AM, Raphaël Rigo wrote:
> wouldn't it make more sense to name raw formats like this : md5-raw ?
> It would be easier to find them, I always find myself typing md5-raw
> first.
Same here, I sort of agree but it is too late.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
