[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABob6iq_KoFtok4SUz=SsS3Tru-74kfMBaBL9oF=nud+jvQbyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:36:10 +0100
From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Sorted format list
2012/2/21 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>:
> Also, I'd really like the CUDA formats renamed to eg. cryptmd5-cuda so
> they end up in the "right" place in this list. This would make it easier
> to notice that a certain format has alternatives.
>
> Even after that, we have inconsistencies like sha-crypt-256 vs.
> cryptsha256-cuda. I'm willing to rename sha-crypt-256 to just
> cryptsha256 (it's shorter!). There are other cases, like salted-sha1
>
Sorting is ok. I'll remove cuda prefixes today.
What with raw formats like:
cuda-rawsha256 raw-sha256
Should they have "raw-" prefix or just "raw" like you proposed for crypt?
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
