[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120203060117.GA15906@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:01:17 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: build experiment
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:05:19AM +0100, magnum wrote:
> This may be a silly question and it might even be off topic: Why is it
> that if I compile everything in one line, like this...
...
> ...it works just fine but I get really poor figures for intrinsics
> md4/md5/sha1,
>
> Benchmarking: Raw MD5 [SSE2i 12x]... DONE
> Raw: 9154K c/s real, 9154K c/s virtual
>
> This is less than half normal speed (formats that do not use
> sse-intrinsics.c performs normally). Btw the binary is 911K instead of
> 1.2M for linux-x86-64.
I don't readily know the answer - I'd need to do the same thing and look
at the binary. Please let us know if you figure this out.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
