[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120131212454.GA4358@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 01:24:54 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Tevesz Andr?s <andras.tevesz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: OpenCL support on OSX [was: john-users]
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:16:23PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> You got some details backwards. Anyway, I will omit c3_fmt.o from your
> new target and skip the c3_fmt.c patch (it's a no-op) and commit the
> rest of your patch to the git repos.
Sounds right.
> I'm not sure why we don't just include c3_fmt.o in the main object list
> and wrap that whole source file in #ifdef HAVE_CRYPT. Solar?
We could, but would this simplify anything? We're adding extra object
files in many Linux and Solaris targets anyway (well, not in all).
We'll gain similarity to those formats requiring OpenSSL 0.9.8+, though.
This is not a thought I originally had because those are not in the main
tree, whereas c3_fmt is.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
