Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120127204527.GA8898@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:45:27 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Recent github patches

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:19:19PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> * HMAC-SHA1 format added
> * HMAC-SHA256 format added

Why these two, but not HMAC-SHA512?  I am just wondering.

> * Experimental support for running "closed loop" - i.e. wordlist mode
> with a .pot file as input. We might want better dupe supression (to
> memory buffer), possibly reusing "unique" code. The current code only
> supresses consecutive dupes (just as for any wordlist file).

In fact, I thought of optionally using the "unique" code in wordlist mode
regardless of where the input comes from.  However, I am concerned that
if changes this invasive are first made in -jumbo, it will deviate from
the main tree's code too far.  Ideally, I should find time and implement
this in the main tree first... but it's not something I'll have time for
any time soon (got other priorities, including for JtR).

Thanks,

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.