[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG5=z93+g9j-72vGD-mP8_Pq1YcTVadi6n8oDB3Y8a8oOjZcNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:00:54 +0530
From: Piyush Mittal <piyush.cse29@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bit slice implementation of DES based hashes
>
> More importantly, note that there's a second "set key" call needed for
> Oracle hashes - with a variable key. Perhaps you did not get this far
> with implementing your code for these hashes yet, though?
>
Yes, that I know and that's code I already made in December but right now I
am just focussing on first encryption using first key because after
checking through GDB I am not getting the right bits in B after first
encryption. I don't know where actually is the problem? From my side there
can be problem in Key initialisation only because while retrieving the 768
key bits I am not getting right sequence. Is there any way to check whether
we have done right initialisation of key or not?
--
Piyush Mittal
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
