[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120119081035.GA31180@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:35 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Dragonfly BSD SHA2
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:43:08AM +0100, magnum wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 11:08 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> > You may need to make two or more 64-bit installs of DragonFly (different
> > versions - e.g., just after they introduced this SHA-2 stuff vs. latest).
>
> There has only been one release with these crypt types included. I think
> they should (at least) include the enclosed diff in order not to break
> things in the next release. This would at least stop things from
> changing between builds. But I am not gonna try persuade them, they
> don't seem interested anyway.
We need to make them aware of your patch at least. I will do that.
The only response I got so far is this:
https://mobile.twitter.com/_xhr_/status/159200543363969024
"@jedisct1 @Openwall Yes, we know it. But unfortunately nobody cared to
fix it ... yet."
_xhr_ is a DragonFly committer.
Thanks!
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
