[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EFE83B1.10305@hushmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:38:25 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SSE/intrinsics for sapB/sapG [was: john-users]
On 12/31/2011 03:37 AM, magnum wrote:
> And how much would it take to introduce a way to do more 64-byte limbs,
> for 128+ bytes of data?
It turns out this is already supported. But I do not really understand
how it can tell I'm doing full 64-byte blocks or not? I just fill them
and postpone setting the length until the last (shorter) block.
> Jim, Simon, how would I do a crypt of between 56 and 63 bytes? Is
> this not possible? Can we actually only do 0-55 *or* 64-119 bytes?
This question remains, and it's a blocker for sapG intrinsics. Is there
a way?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
