|
Message-ID: <CAG5=z90cC3AfQc1HXKFBBJ791vKzwVxdUWmhRkLCPZDRpbYHVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:03:46 +0530
From: piyush mittal <piyush.cse29@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bit slice implementation of DES based hashes
Correct sequence is
00000000
00010001
00100010
00110011
01000100
01010101
01100110
01110111
And you are extremely right.String will be
"\x80\x11\x22\x33\x44\x55\x66\x77"
Thanks a lot.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 08:22:35PM +0530, piyush mittal wrote:
> > Even if I drops the parity bits then remaining 56 bits are as follows
> >
> > 00000000010001010001001100111000100101010111001101110111
> >
> > and its corresponding ASCII equivalent I am not getting.
>
> I did not verify the above binary value (in fact, it looks wrong to me),
> but I see no problem in converting it to an ASCII equivalent for
> DES_bs_set_key() or DES_bs_set_key_LM() (these ASCII strings would be
> different). In fact, I already posted it for DES_bs_set_key():
>
> > > "\x80\x11\x22\x33\x44\x55\x66\x77"
>
> Alexander
>
--
Piyush Mittal
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
National Institute of Technology,Rourkela
INDIA
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.