[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000601ccbd9c$19f116c0$4dd34440$@net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:45:42 -0600
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: 1.7.9-jumbo
Possibly we should enhance that script, and give it an optional command line
switch, that dumps out the formats with greatest disparaging timings. So,
something like -diff 6 would list any format that was +6% or -6%
difference between them. Thus, you could run a 'normal' test, and if there
are issues you want to dig deeper into, such as specific formats much faster
or slower, then an option like this could be used.
Jim
>From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com]
>
>On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:48:33PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
>> Minimum: 0.81602 real, 0.81602 virtual
>...
>> Also, someone could want to identify the format that became 18% slower
>> and see if this is reproducible and if it can be avoided (in a future
>> version).
>
>Reproduced on another pair of benchmark runs:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
