[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <029e01ccbd0a$ae6614f0$0b323ed0$@net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:24:45 -0600
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Test results for 179 jumbo-4
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com]
>Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 4:10 PM
>To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>Subject: Re: [john-dev] Test results for 179 jumbo-4
>
>On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:45:59PM -0600, jfoug wrote:
>> >BTW, why aren't you testing -jumbo-5 yet?
>>
>> I will, but my time is short.
>
>Oh, I thought that you'd abandon further testing of -4 as soon as -5
>appeared, so this would not take you additional time.
It's not that, it is that I reload directories and move some stuff around,
each time there is a major release. I simply have not done that yet.
>> >Thus, I am puzzled as to why you're getting them defined on SPARC,
>> I have put a patch on the wiki. It is based on jumbo-4, but I am 99%
>Thanks. This is post-jumbo-5 material now, and I think this issue is
>minor enough that it does not warrant a -jumbo-6 yet.
It is a very minor fix. It should not impact any 'real' usage of JtR, other
than running it against the newest test suite code, which I will not be
releasing until Sunday anyway. In 'real' runtime, someone on a BE could run
dynamic_29. They could not run dynamic_27, it would give a format not known.
I am sure there will be other changes, which we can move forward as a J6. I
really have not dug in yet :) I have been more focused on other things.
Jim.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
