[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111215221146.GA10983@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:11:46 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: mdfourmmx
Simon -
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:48:08PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> No, I don't mind keeping them although I have no use of them myself.
> Since they use the same buffer layout as the intrinsics, there is
> practically no extra work. I already have a working patch that adds
> Simons's MD4 .S as posted here (but modified a little):
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2005/05/15/8
That patch and now 0013-Bartavelle-s-mdfourmmx-added.patch, which will
get into 1.7.9-jumbo-3, lack copyright and license statements. And I've
just noticed that md5-mmx.S already in -jumbo lacks those as well. Can
you please submit a patch adding them, perhaps shortly after I put out
-jumbo-3 (thus, for -jumbo-4)?
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
