[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111215213542.GA8282@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:35:42 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.9-jumbo
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:41:15PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> Done, to http://openwall.info/wiki/john/patches#Jumbo-rebase-for-1.7.9
>
> Note: I'm not sure all Makefile targets ended up 100% OK (where they
> were changed in core). Other than that, I'm not aware of any problems,
> but this should be reviewed/tested of course.
I am finally reviewing/processing these patches. My current plan is to
generate 1.7.9-jumbo-1 using just these two patches:
0001-john-1.7.9-jumbo-1-1.7.8-jumbo-8-equivalent.patch.gz
0002-Fixes-for-dynamic_fmt-vs.-new-MD5_std.c.patch
and some minor corrections of my own (re-added Auto* external modes to
john.conf, which I think were inadvertently removed by 0001 above,
removed relbench.pl revision 3 in favor of relbench revision 4).
Then apply:
0003-All-30-patches-originally-for-1.7.8-jumbo-8.patch.gz
and generate 1.7.9-jumbo-2. Then apply the rest of the post-1.7.9
patches uploaded so far (that would be until 0049 right now) and
generate 1.7.9-jumbo-3.
Of these, -1 and -2 would be for revision tracking only, and they would
exist as diffs only. For -3, I intend to generate tarballs as well.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
