Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111126195740.GA16841@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:57:40 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: mdfourmmx

magnum, Bartavelle -

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:48:08PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> By the way I'm *now* quoting from the mail archive, I never got
> the mail I'm quoting here - or perhaps I accidentally deleted it somehow.

Please let me know if this occurs again - I'll check the logs.

> OT, what I meant is that it's very easy to add mdfourmmx() to a format
> that already supports intrinsics.
> 
> > OK.  It sounds like the three of you (JimF, magnum, Simon) really want
> > to drop these older files in favor of the intrinsics.
> 
> No, I don't mind keeping them although I have no use of them myself.
> Since they use the same buffer layout as the intrinsics, there is
> practically no extra work. I already have a working patch that adds
> Simons's MD4 .S as posted here (but modified a little):
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2005/05/15/8

Let's get this into -jumbo, then.  Like I said, I was under impression
that all of Simon's stuff was merged by now.  It is wrong that a good
contribution like this was not merged for so long.  I am sorry for that.

Thanks,

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.