[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ECD91A8.4010203@hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:36:56 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.9-jumbo
2011-11-23 21:01, magnum wrote:
> 2011-11-23 19:41, magnum wrote:
>> Done, to http://openwall.info/wiki/john/patches#Jumbo-rebase-for-1.7.9
>>
>> Note: I'm not sure all Makefile targets ended up 100% OK (where they
>> were changed in core). Other than that, I'm not aware of any problems,
>> but this should be reviewed/tested of course.
>
> More notes:
>
> - I think the relbench.pl ended up as patched by Jim, not the newer
> version by Solar.
> - And on that matter, was the Windows time output changed in base? I
> might have reverted that unintentionally, not sure. I did not
> intentionally do the right thing anywhere :)
> - The various arch.h's need to be double checked after these patches, so
> they match core. Most notably x86-ssei.h.
Yet some:
- I don't even know what "undrop" is for, but it looks like it was lost
from main() during rebasing.
- Shouldn't targets like linux-x86-64 have this?
CFLAGS_MAIN="$(CFLAGS) -DHAVE_CRYPT" \
If not, john.c will be compiled without HAVE_CRYPT, no? This applies
even to core John. But I may misunderstand the whole thing.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
