[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBD1F9D.5040507@hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:14:05 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: jumbo rebased on current CVS
2011-11-11 01:16, magnum wrote:
> 2011-11-10 21:00, Solar Designer wrote:
>> DES_bs_b.c
>> x86-64.S
>> x86-mmx.S
>> x86-sse.S
>
> All of the above passes Test Suite.
To be a little more specific, these builds were tested:
linux-x86-64
linux-x86-64 with omp (== intrinsics, right?)
linux-x86-mmx
linux-x86-sse2
linux-x86-any
generic [64/64 BS]
They all pass with and without jumbo applied. The 32-bit builds were
actually cross compiled and tested on x64. I can't test AVX nor XOP stuff.
With jumbo applied, all builds were also tested for correct -encoding
support, ie. LM upper-casing of selected codepage.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
