Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBD9701.7090209@hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:43:29 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: more targets using sse-intrinsics.S

2011-11-11 22:05, jfoug wrote:
> The big difference, is we will likely need to change to an array of
> SSE buffers, vs a single buffer of MMX_COEF. We need SSE_PARA buffers
> of MMX_COEF. The changes are not too hard, but DO take some time and
> finesse. One of the formats (pix-md5), we should simply make thin,
> and link to dynamic_19, which already has x86, SSE2 (mmx-sse) and
> SSE2i (sse-intrisics). The other formats will have to be tweaked to
> properly use sse-intrisics.

OK... so let's do them! Piece of cake (lol). I can start with the
MS-SQL's as I am aquainted to them from the Unicode work.

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.