[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBAF754.7070704@hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:57:40 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: more targets using sse-intrinsics.S (was: linux-x86-64i
target, using sse-intrinsics.S)
2011-11-09 18:47, magnum wrote:
> 2. Should we support this for 32-bit at all? I suppose I can cross
> compile a 32-bit .S file with icc (haven't tried it) but I have no idea
> if it will perform better or worse than gcc on a 32-bit machine. I
> suppose this should be verified on a machine that is really 32-bit.
It seems I can't produce a 32-bit file unless I go through the hoops of
downloading more stuff from Intel.
icc -m32 -S -o sse-intrinsics-32.S sse-intrinsics.c -O3 -fno-builtin
-DUSING_ICC_S_FILE -funroll-loops -c -Wall
catastrophic error: Compiler configuration problem encountered. The
expected target architecture compiler is missing (12.0-ia32 != 12.0-intel64)
compilation aborted for sse-intrinsics.c (code 1)
Except for that obstacle, I think I have all things in place. I created
a mockup sse-intrinsics-32.S using gcc o.O
Jim, did you ever download icc? Do you have a version that can make a
32-bit .S file?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
