[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110817203107.GA30823@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:31:07 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: pkzip encr
Jim -
This is a very welcome addition, thank you!
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:34:52PM -0500, jfoug wrote:
> Benchmarking: pkzip [N/A]... DONE
> Raw: 6594M c/s
How's that speed even possible with the current formats interface and on
current CPUs? "dummy" only achieves up to approx. 130M c/s on "--test"
(which is reported more like 130000K c/s, indeed).
Are you somehow skipping impossible keys, yet counting them? Just a
guess. But even in that case you'd need to hack code outside of the new
format definition in order for the speedup to be seen on benchmarks.
So this got me curious.
Thanks again,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
