[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E486B91.5000803@bredband.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:42:57 +0200
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Problems with the 0007 patch
On 2011-08-15 02:04, magnum wrote:
> On 2011-08-15 01:52, JimF wrote:
>> I have not had a chance to look at 0010 other than looking at the patch
>> code. It appears good.
>>
>> I wonder if this would be applicable to mscash1, or any other 'fast'
>> format?
>
> mscash1 is very fast and use an identical set_key_helper() as NT, so it
> would probably benefit, but much less. There is a small performance drop
> for the "Only one salt" case. I'll do it and post a patch.
Not applicable, mscash1 is always non-interleaved so it uses the shared
plaintowcs().
I can see some other possibilities though. I'll try it out.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
