[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3C704FFB66454127998321CF6A8244F3@D9VGLK61>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:52:39 -0500
From: "JimF" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with the 0007 patch
From: "magnum" <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
>I do not think your fix was busted, it was just fixed for the case of xBuf
>!= 1
>
> So if your fix ever worked for sequential buffers (xBuf=1), it will now
> also work for interleaved ones.
Now that I have had a chance to unwind, and actaully look at the patches, I
see what I had missed when writing them the first time. Yes, your fixes are
correct.
> I'm more worried about the 0010 patch. Did that break something? I *think*
> it should not.
I have not had a chance to look at 0010 other than looking at the patch
code. It appears good.
I wonder if this would be applicable to mscash1, or any other 'fast' format?
Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
