[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <598B3347FCFA4496B821C24A610F184A@D9VGLK61>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:51:19 -0500
From: "JimF" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: 1.7.8.Jumbo-1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Solar Designer" <solar@...nwall.com>
>
> Then the patch should be reworked to use the same approach that
> john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-auto_have_sha256-03.diff.gz does. Would you do that?
I had problems with that patch. I was able to build, but link failed, on one
sparc box, and build and link worked on another, but the shared libs did not
have proper exports on another sparc box. Now, it is VERY likely, that
these boxes were not setup properly. However, I have no reason to ask for
oSSL to be updated properly, thus can not make that type of request on these
systems. Thus, this keeps john from being usable there.
> I am tempted not to apply john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-jimfpatch-4.diff for now,
> because it does not apply on top of john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-zip-0.diff.gz
> anyway (most hunks are rejected) and because fixing it to make it apply
> feels like a waste of time (I think it needs to be re-done to check the
> OpenSSL version number).
>
> I might include the DOMINOSEC_fmt.c, lotus5_fmt.c, and sapB_fmt.c hunks
> now, though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
