[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110616193649.GB7055@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:36:49 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Aleksey's Status Report - #5 of 15
Shinnok,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:01:47PM +0300, Shinnok wrote:
> Alexander, 2 clause BSD is ok,
Yes, but:
> or something else more appropriate for
> JtR, as specified here http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing?
Yes, I prefer 0-clause BSD, so to speak. Just the copyright and
permission statements that you'd find in a BSD license, but with the
restrictive clauses completely removed. I simply see no reason to
impose those restrictions.
This is what I use for my own code lately (with some exceptions) - e.g.,
blists, which we released earlier this month, is fully under this kind
of license.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
