|
Message-ID: <20110411215520.GA11896@openwall.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:55:20 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: sha256 format patches On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:47:48PM +0200, ?ukasz Odzioba wrote: > This is link to newest version sha256patch: > http://sphere.pl/~ukasz/gsoc2011/john-1.7.6-sha256cuda-1.diff > Code is a bit dirty I will do cleanup and link to wiki soon. I've benchmarked this on GeForce 8800 GTS 512. One instance: Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... DONE Raw: 6320K c/s real, 6320K c/s virtual That's some speedup over the previous version, but by far not as much as you reported for your system. Two simultaneous instances: [user@...alhost run]$ . r [user@...alhost run]$ Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... DONE Raw: 4411K c/s real, 4420K c/s virtual DONE Raw: 4403K c/s real, 4420K c/s virtual [1]- Done ./john -te -fo=sha256cuda [2]+ Done ./john -te -fo=sha256cuda Now with partial hashes (truncated to 64 bits): Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... DONE Raw: 6852K c/s real, 6852K c/s virtual [user@...alhost run]$ Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... DONE Raw: 5057K c/s real, 5067K c/s virtual DONE Raw: 5047K c/s real, 5057K c/s virtual [1]- Done ./john -te -fo=sha256cuda [2]+ Done ./john -te -fo=sha256cuda Larger BLOCKS: //#define BLOCKS 4096 #define BLOCKS 16384 Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... DONE Raw: 7087K c/s real, 7087K c/s virtual [user@...alhost run]$ . r [user@...alhost run]$ Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... Benchmarking: SHA256CUDA [SHA256]... DONE Raw: 5263K c/s real, 5263K c/s virtual DONE Raw: 5232K c/s real, 5252K c/s virtual [1]- Done ./john -te -fo=sha256cuda [2]+ Done ./john -te -fo=sha256cuda Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.