[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110328132401.GA10095@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:24:01 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: move most GSoC discussions to john-dev
Oops, I meant to send the below to john-users rather than john-dev, and
I just did. In the message below, "in here" refers to john-users.
For now, my advice is that whoever wants to apply for the GSoC tasks
should be on both john-dev and john-users.
Sorry for the mess. I knew it would be difficult to draw the line,
which is why john-dev did not exist until recently. But we're going to
need it for truly development-focused discussions, and I think it's best
to start moving most GSoC stuff to john-dev.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:18:05PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should start moving GSoC discussions to john-dev. So far,
> some occurred on john-users and some on john-dev. We got useful
> comments from some folks who are on john-users but not on -dev (yet?),
> but we shouldn't be abusing john-users for discussions around JtR
> development indefinitely. I am going to continue replying to messages
> in existing threads in here, and others are encouraged to do so as well,
> but please join john-dev and start new development focused threads on
> john-dev from now on. You may subscribe here:
>
> http://www.openwall.com/john/#lists
>
> It is still appropriate to post to john-users when we need users'
> feedback on proposed functionality or when we have anything ready for
> end users (e.g., a useful patch). However, advanced discussions of
> source code, etc. should proceed on john-dev.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
