[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8DDF9B.3030705@bredband.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:44:11 +0100
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: john scalability
On 2011-03-23 17:26, Alain Espinosa wrote:
> I do not use all the available get_hash*
> funtions. Degradation appear as fast as 10,000 hashs. The solution is
> simple, when get some free time i make a patch including the UTF8
> stuff.
Someone please explain briefly what those different size tables are
about. What happens without this patch, that make such a huge
performance hit? How come it affects inital loading too? I looked at the
code and found sizes and thresholds but I didn't get any wiser.
thanks
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
