[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8071C0.1050408@bredband.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:16:00 +0100
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Changing --markov[=LEVEL[:START:END[:MAXLEN]]] to
--markov[=SECTION]
On 2011-03-16 07:37, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> In my opinion, the distinction is only necessary for interrupted
> --markov sessions.
> The command line could always use --markov=SECTION, just make sure it is
> later on possible to know whether the .rec file contains a section name
> or length and other parameters.
I think we should keep supporting the old style (the updated one in
intrinsics-fixes-2). Except for that, fine with me.
Regardless of this, maybe markov should use a check similar to
incremental, that the stats file has not changed.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
