[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:52:25 -0300
From: Matias Fonzo <selk@...gora.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Symbol versioning approximation trips on compat symbols
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:57:54 -0600
"A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org> wrote:
> On 01/28/19 00:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > As I explained, precisely that is not the case because the main musl
> > user, Alpine Linux, builds musl with a broken toolchain that is not
> > properly targeted to musl's features. I think the official musl
> > instructions have the same result.
>
>
> *ahem* Adélie? OpenWrt? Void? midipix? morpheus? Emscripten?
>
> Alpine hardly has a monopoly on usage of musl.
>
> Of course, since almost all of us follow the patches and configuration
> of m-c-m, that's a moot point. But the idea that "musl == Alpine" is
> a harmful one, especially as the community continues to grow.
>
It should be nice if musl.cc (if this is community-musl page) could
list all the distributions based on Musl (including Dragora,
Sabotage, ...) and all the cross-compiler projects, etc. :-)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
