[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:46:35 -0300
From: Nahuel Grisolía <nahuel.grisolia@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fast freebsd MD5 implementation
Simon Marechal wrote:
> Solar Designer wrote :
>> Athlon 64 3000+ 2.0 GHz
>> old code: 8970 c/s
>> 4x: 7060
>> 8x: 4500
>> 12x: 5100
>> 16x: 5100
>> 20x: 5020
>>
>> Q6600 2.4 GHz (one core):
>> old code: 10200 c/s
>> 4x: 14844
>> 8x: 9592
>> 12x: 9374
>> 16x: 3200
>> 20x: 3100
>
> My GCC tests are from version 4.1.3, which is old. I had a friend tweak
> the source with 4.3, and he could get 5000 k/s on the laptop where i
> tested the following:
>
> With ICC 10.1, U7600, 1.2ghz, 32bits
> 4x: 7628
> 8x; 11300
> 12x: 10200
> 16x: 7950
>
> This is interesting, as I assumed 3 was the best, based on BarSW
> results. But I suppose it would be true only in 64bit mode.
>
Sorry for this kind of stupid question.. but... what "c/s" means? and
what about those 12X, 16X...?
Thanx in advance.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
