[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:26:22 +0200
From: Simon Marechal <simon@...quise.net>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fast freebsd MD5 implementation
Solar Designer wrote :
> Athlon 64 3000+ 2.0 GHz
> old code: 8970 c/s
> 4x: 7060
> 8x: 4500
> 12x: 5100
> 16x: 5100
> 20x: 5020
>
> Q6600 2.4 GHz (one core):
> old code: 10200 c/s
> 4x: 14844
> 8x: 9592
> 12x: 9374
> 16x: 3200
> 20x: 3100
My GCC tests are from version 4.1.3, which is old. I had a friend tweak
the source with 4.3, and he could get 5000 k/s on the laptop where i
tested the following:
With ICC 10.1, U7600, 1.2ghz, 32bits
4x: 7628
8x; 11300
12x: 10200
16x: 7950
This is interesting, as I assumed 3 was the best, based on BarSW
results. But I suppose it would be true only in 64bit mode.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
