oss-security - Re: CVE-2023-23583: Intel - Denial of Service

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231114190713.GA11191@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:07:13 +0100
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@...el.com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...il.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-23583: Intel - Denial of Service - Privilege Escalation (Reptar)

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:31:51AM -0800, Antonio Gomez Iglesias wrote:
> Name of the issue: Redundant Prefix Issue
> 
> Description of the issue
> Under certain microarchitectural conditions, Intel has identified cases
> where execution of an instruction (REP MOVSB) encoded with a redundant
> REX prefix may result in unpredictable system behavior resulting in a
> system crash/hang, or, in some limited scenarios, may allow escalation
> of privilege from CPL3 to CPL0.
> This Redundant Prefix Issue is assigned CVE-2023-23583 with a CVSS Base
> Score of 8.8 High CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H.
> 
> Mitigation
> Intel is providing a microcode update to mitigate this issue: https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/releases/tag/microcode-20231114

Thank you, Antonio!

Here's a writeup and reproducer tool by Tavis Ormandy:

https://lock.cmpxchg8b.com/reptar.html

The GitHub release page above links to Intel security advisory:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00950.html

which specifies what CPU generations are affected (from 10th generation
Intel Core or 3rd generation Xeon Scalable to current), and links to a
table with "an exhaustive list of processors" matched against this issue
and previously disclosed issues:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-technology/software-security-guidance/processors-affected-consolidated-product-cpu-model.html

It also says "Please refer to the technical paper here for additional
information", where "here" is a link supposedly to "the technical
paper", but it's a non-existent page currently, so I'm not posting the
URL yet (not sure if it'll stay the same when the page is published).

Meanwhile, Tavis' writeup is great!

Alexander

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.