|
Message-ID: <20161015173558.657276ad@pc1> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:35:58 +0200 From: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: cve-assign@...re.org Subject: Update on MatrixSSL miscalculation (incomplete fix for CVE-2016-6887) https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/54-Update-on-MatrixSSL-miscalculation-incomplete-fix-for-CVE-2016-6887.html CVE-assigners: I think this could get a CVE as an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-6887 ---------- I recently [1] reported how I found various bugs in the bignum implementation of MatrixSSL, some of them leading to remotely exploitable vulnerabilities. One of the bugs was that the modular exponentiation function - pstm_exptmod() - produced wrong results for some inputs . This wasn't really fixed, but only worked around by restricting the allowed size of the modulus. Not surprisingly it is still possible to find inputs that cause miscalculations (code). I reported this to MatrixSSL on August 1st. Recently MatrixSSL released another update (3.8.6) fixing several vulnerabilities reported by Craig Young from Tripwire [2]. However the pstm_exptmod() bug is still there. It is unclear how exploitable such bugs are, but given that it's used in the context of cryptographic functions handling secret key material this is clearly a reason for concern. MatrixSSL has long advertised itself as a safer alternative to OpenSSL, because it didn't suffer from the same kind of high severity bugs. I think it has been sufficiently shown that this was due to the fact that nobody was looking. But what's more worrying is that bugs they knew about for several months now don't get fixed properly. [1] https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/51-Fun-with-Bignums-Crashing-MatrixSSL-and-more.html [2] http://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/security-data-protection/cyber-security/flawed-matrixssl-code-highlights-need-for-better-iot-update-practices/ -- Hanno Böck https://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: hanno@...eck.de GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42 View attachment "matrixssl-exptmod-bug-variant2.c" of type "text/x-c++src" (4564 bytes) Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.