Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160825175049.6E9186C0BB5@smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:50:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: wmealing@...hat.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: Linux kernel mbcache lock contention denial of service.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be0726d33cb8f411945884664924bed3cb8c70ee
> https://lwn.net/Articles/668718/
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360968
> 
> A design flaw was found in the file extended attribute handling of the
> linux kernels handling of cached attributes. Too many entries in the
> cache cause a soft lockup while attempting to iterate the cache and
> access relevant locks.
> 
> Upstream has replaced the mbcache code with an updated version which
> was not a patch but a clear-cut reimplementation of the code, no
> single diff
> 
> Soft lockup information is in both the bugzilla.kernel.org and
> referred to in the LWN article. This would affect containers running
> with ext4 as it shares the same mbcache between all containers/host.
> 
> This did not affect Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions 5,6 or 7, so I
> can't validate the claim that it does affect other newer kernels.
> This may be worthwhile tracking for others who are affected by this
> flaw.
> 
> For those following along at home, this seemed to be fixed in:
> 
> git tag --contains be0726d33cb8f411945884664924bed3cb8c70ee
> v4.6

Use CVE-2015-8952.

- -- 
CVE Assignment Team
M/S M300, 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ A PGP key is available for encrypted communications at
  http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=bAj5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.