[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKG8Do7icu-1yBEVZm4Rb9JnUP6Oxz2Rd__B+N_xbj88KTsE=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:03:05 +0200
From: Cedric Buissart <cbuissar@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: CVE-2016-4973 gcc: Targets using libssp for SSP are missing
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality
Hi,
This is to disclose the following CVE:
CVE-2016-4973 gcc: Targets using libssp for SSP are missing
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality
It was found that targets using gcc's libssp library for Stack Smashing
Protection (among others: Cygwin, MinGW, newlib, RTEMS; but not Glibc,
Bionic, NetBSD which provide SSP in libc), are missing the Object Size
Checking feature, even when explicitly requested with _FORTIFY_SOURCE.
Vulnerable binaries compiled against such targets do not benefit of such
protection, increasing the chances of success of a buffer overflow attack.
There is currently no upstream patch. Discussions on the subject & patch
proposal can be found in the Red Hat corresponding bugzilla :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-4973
Impact: Low
CVSSv3 scoring : 3.6 CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Note regarding the scoring : only the GCC flaw was taken into account, not
its potential combination with a flaw in an affected binary.
The flaw was reported by Yaakov Selkowitz (Red Hat)
Best regards,
Cedric
--
Cedric Buissart,
Product Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
