[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416140557.72e3e4d3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:05:57 +0200
From: Stefan Cornelius <scorneli@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: net-snmp snmp_pdu_parse() function incompletely
initializaition vulnerability
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:44:04 +0800
罗大龙 <luodalongde@...il.com> wrote:
> HI there,
>
>
>
> Greeting! This is Qinghao Tang from QIHU 360 company, China. I am a
> security researcher there.
>
> I'm writing to apply for a CVE ID, for a 0day vulnerability in
> net-snmp. Please refer to below report.
>
The upstream patch is here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/f23bcd3ac6ddee5d0a48f9703007ccc738914791/
As linked from the commit, the (currently restricted) upstream bug is:
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2615/
Although this leads to crashes at different locations, all of them can
be attributed to snmp_pdu_parse() leaving stale netsnmp_variable_list
items in the list, so I think one CVE should be enough.
In case anyone is interested, the Red Hat bug is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212408
Thanks,
--
Stefan Cornelius / Red Hat Product Security
Come talk to Red Hat Product Security at the Summit!
Red Hat Summit 2015 - https://www.redhat.com/summit/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
