[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54CA82B8.7080409@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:58:00 -0500
From: Marc Deslauriers <marc.deslauriers@...onical.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: xchat/hexchat don't properly verify
SSL certificates
On 2015-01-29 01:52 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> As reported [1]:
>
> XChat did not verify that the server hostname matched the domain name in the
> subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field in X.509 certificates. This
> could allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to spoof an SSL server if they had a
> certificate that was valid for any domain name.
>
> The same code is used in hexchat.
>
> This was initially reported to hexchat in 2013 [2] and fixed last November [3].
> I'm not sure if it should receive a 2013 or a 2014 CVE. Can one be assigned to
> this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839
> [2] https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524
> [3]
> https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a4910a7e02d
>
Looks like XChat-GNOME is vulnerable also.
Marc.
--
Marc Deslauriers
Ubuntu Security Engineer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
Canonical Ltd. | http://www.canonical.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
