Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A592AB.1020303@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:21:39 +0530
From: Ratul Gupta <ratulg@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: CVE request: pam: password hashes aren't compared case-sensitively

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038555

It was found that in pam_userdb module for Pam, password hashes weren't 
compared case-sensitively, which could lead to acceptance of hashes for 
completely different passwords, which shouldn't be accepted.

After hashing the user's password with crypt(), pam_userdb compares the 
result to the stored hash case-insensitively with strncasecmp(), which 
should be avoided, as it could result in an increased possibility of a 
successful brute-force attack.

Can a CVE be assigned for this?

-- 
Regards,

Ratul Gupta / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.