[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FFF0170.4080500@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:55:12 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
Subject: Re: CVE Request: Overflow fix in bash 4.2 patch 33
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2012 08:04 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:29:22AM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>> On 07/11/2012 10:15 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the bash maintainer kindly mailed us and other vendors a
>>> notification of a overflow in the bash "test" builtin when
>>> "/dev/fd/..." filenames are used.
>>>
>>> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-4.2-patches/bash42-033
>>>
>>> Reproducer: test -e /dev/fd/111111111111111111111111111111111
>>>
>>> Problem is caught by -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 if enabled, and
>>> likely also by -fstack-protector (not tested)
>>>
>>> Goes all the way back to old bashes.
>>>
>>> The likeliness of people able to inject those filenames into
>>> shell scripts and not being able to execute shellcode
>>> themselves is however slim. (setuid root shell scripts are not
>>> possible.)
>>>
>>> Security (CVE) relevant scenario we thought of is breaking out
>>> of a restricted shell mode.
>>>
>>> Ciao, Marcus
>>
>> Can you give a more concrete example, e.g. you're talking about
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/The-Restricted-Shell.html
>>
>>
I assume? Are we simply talking about violating those restrictions?
>
> Yes. Breaking out of the restricted shell using this issue.
>
> $ bash -r bash: /dev/pts/9: Gesperrt: Die Ausgabe darf nicht
> umgeleitet werden. $ test -f
> /dev/fd/111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
>
>
*** buffer overflow detected ***: bash terminated
> ...
>
> So basically without fortification measures you can inject a ASCII
> based shell-code to execute code you shouldn't.
>
> (One can argue that of how secure you evaluate restricted shells
> ...)
>
> Ciao, Marcus
Please use CVE-2012-3410 for this issue. The --restricted stuff is
advertised as a security measure and this can be used to bypass it, so
it gets a CVE.
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP/wFtAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTAQAQALE+Ae4WI4RXoYgQ+FdsMd3Q
x5rlOlAYDSN/ug65OPOZ9y3s1igcb7cuggaGo7LmWDjA9P7Jg5E4i1rHn/vFFBjE
G1ZKU/ep9Y2HSqTGMOSxKm+sXkoV2ZIdMFH4Q7TB1hpp0i9E+ju4Saj5k2y0ayoj
E8x5tvR90JYHP5c1s0bnJQISb4yncYruYaVqdVa3AVMmdZVgiklGAmLKsSCbZCrZ
cCdmTnGZW8R++LR1goZBVkOUFYwygP1AeBvyqGhBJpe638xpVcp9XtTewUQokDCF
Mieqfppx0N9r1slV59y1O0KIqzD1oq/GmK5xChrxDXUnpsuwLWtAoRQfO6wSbSr5
2OgE3/vnfAFUW7Dg+U2SomYNamCtQQTn0aI+UPwD/nwoSgI+WqcBjFs33AhE4tnP
OclmWJEsk79AFw1UzVNWM6medmADa9EPMImLfi/DHa3G4sb7aJwzwevwfjFP7AN8
7mHPSYBCKjnhIg7RUfaeJtBBot3B+c1cYiN0uW6LDEP+I0CwvVlSCaCYL23VSpEZ
hP7rUua4NFeozhskq+OvWq4zDzkCet5QMTFi4/obFx4LKA+XGlEW6K4GqDDOphNK
Wt3qmSzD7wJov1fNx2G7ZY7q9UtKLjwOcuHYPKsnRjwu6ATjAw+FZF9RuuibcdF9
8S1NSGX3hoeUpcGcg3Tx
=oSt+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
