Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:43:40 +0100
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
CC: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@...oste.net>,
        david b <db.pub.mail@...il.com>, Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>,
        Christoph Höger <choeger@...tu-berlin.de>,
        John Goerzen <jgoerzen@...plete.org>
Subject: CVE Request -- OfflineIMAP -- 1), failed to validate remote SSL server
 certificate 2), allows SSLv2 protocol

Hello Steve, vendors,

   two issues with security implications have been recently reported against OfflineIMAP:

   I), Didn't check SSL server certificate

   Description:
   OfflineIMAP prior commit:
   [1] https://github.com/nicolas33/offlineimap/commit/4f57b94e2333c37c5a7251fc88dfeda9bc0b226a

   did not perform SSL server certificate validation,
   even when "ssl = yes" option was specified in the
   configuration file. If an attacker was able to get
   a carefully-crafted certificate signed by a
   Certificate Authority trusted by OfflineIMAP,
   the attacker could use the certificate during a
   man-in-the-middle attack and potentially confuse
   OfflineIMAP into accepting it by mistake.

   References:
   [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603450
   [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665382

   II), Allows SSLv2 protocol

   Description:
   In commit:
   [4] https://github.com/nicolas33/offlineimap/commit/4f57b94e2333c37c5a7251fc88dfeda9bc0b226a

   when SSL server certificate validation support was added
   to OfflineIMAP it was still possible to use SSL v2 protocol
   version. Version 2 of SSL protocol version is known
   to be prone to multiple deficiencies, each of them
   having security implications (to mention some of them):
   [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Sockets_Layer#Security

   Thus SSLv2 protocol version should be disabled in OfflineIMAP.

   References:
   [6] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962
   [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665386

Could you allocate CVE ids for these issues? (though opened for
discussion of any / none of them worthy of it)

Thanks && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.